Exotic dancers who claim these folks were held against their will and photographed by San Diego, Ca law enforcement officers throughout a compliance raid can progress because of their lawsuit, a federal judge ruled this week.
The 24 dancers, who may have worked in the Cheetahs or Expose strip clubs, claim the officers violated their constitutional rights in the raids July 15, 2013, and March 6, 2014.
According to the complaint, five to 15 police officers traveled to the clubs through the early-evening hours and ordered the san diego female strippers right into a dressing room, where they were told to wait patiently until called, the lawsuit said.
The officers then questioned the dancers, who had been scantily clad, checked their city-issued adult entertainer permits, asked about tattoos or piercings and photographed them.
The lawsuit claims a few of the officers “made arrogant and demeaning comments towards the entertainers and ordered these to expose body parts in order that they could ostensibly photograph their tattoos.”
The dancers say the process lasted greater than an hour, and whenever several asked if they could leave, police threatened them arrest and stationed officers with the exits, the suit says.
Lawyers for The San Diego Area police asked the judge to dismiss the lawsuit, saying the search and seizure was reasonable as presented from the city’s permitting law, that enables police inspections of adult entertainment businesses. Police have said that cataloging tattoos is a straightforward method to identify dancers who regularly change their appearances.
“Submitting photographs and providing identification during reasonable inspections, to avoid losing a permit, is qualitatively diverse from stripping to undergarments, huddling in the dressing room for about 1 hour, and submitting into a photo shoot that involved the exposure of intimate parts of the body, to prevent arrest,” he wrote.
The judge is also allowing the lawsuit to look forward with a false-imprisonment claim along with a Monell claim, which could hold supervisors liable for the actions of lower-ranking officers if 70dexmpky may be proven that the behavior was a part of a long-standing custom or practice within the Police Department.
Even though the judge agreed using the city that three raids in just a year don’t amount to a “long-standing” or “widespread” practice, the judge also cited comments by a police spokesman who told the media that such raids were routine.